|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHO YOU ARE: |
|
The Demographics of |
|
Maricopa County |
|
|
|
|
Arizona Population 2000 |
|
Percent of Arizona |
|
|
|
|
Percent of Arizona Growth |
|
1990 to 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Tribal Land Tribal Land Total |
|
|
|
Maricopa County 3,062,078 10,071
3,072,149 |
|
Percent of Total
99.7% 0.3% |
|
|
|
Arizona 4,952,036 178,596
5,130,632 |
|
Percent
of Total 96.5% 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
Maricopa |
|
County Arizona |
|
|
|
Under
20 years
29.8% 29.6% |
|
|
|
20 to
54 years
50.6% 48.8% |
|
|
|
55
years and over 19.5% 21.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
Median
Age 32.0
34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa |
|
County
Arizona |
|
White 66.2% 63.8% |
|
African American
3.5%
2.9%
American Indian
1.5% 4.5%
Asian
2.1%
1.7% |
|
Other 1.8% 1.7% |
|
Hispanic 24.8% 25.3% |
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Tribal Land Tribal Land Total |
|
|
|
Percent population with: |
|
High School Degree |
|
Maricopa
County 82.6% 61.6% 82.5% |
|
Arizona
81.6% 57.5% 81.0% |
|
College Degree* |
|
Maricopa County 32.9% 7.8% 32.9% |
|
Arizona
30.8% 12.1% 30.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Tribal Land Tribal Land Total |
|
|
|
Percent population below poverty: |
|
|
|
Maricopa County
11.5% 34.6% 11.6% |
|
Arizona
12.6% 41.7% 13.6% |
|
|
|
|
Maricopa |
|
County Arizona |
|
|
|
Total Households 1,132,886 1,901,327 |
|
|
|
Renter 32.5%
32.0% |
|
Owner 67.5%
68.0% |
|
|
|
Average HH Size 2.67
2.64 |
|
Tribal
3.49 3.73 |
|
Non-tribal
2.67 2.61 |
|
|
|
U.S. Average HH Size = 2.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Tribal Land Tribal Land Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County 4.7% 13.7% 4.7% |
|
|
|
Arizona
5.2% 22.9% 5.6% |
|
|
|
|
Maricopa |
|
County U.S. |
|
|
|
Mining
0.1% 0.4% |
|
Construction 7.6% 5.1%
Manufacturing
10.5% 14.0% |
|
TCPU
5.5% 5.3% |
|
Trade
23.9% 23.0% |
|
FIRE 7.8% 5.8% |
|
Services 32.9% 30.7% |
|
Government 11.8% 15.7% |
|
|
|
|
1990 2000 |
|
|
|
Mining
0.1% 0.1% |
|
Construction
5.6% 7.6%
Manufacturing
14.1% 10.5% |
|
TCPU
6.0% 5.5% |
|
Trade
25.1% 23.9% |
|
FIRE 7.7% 7.8% |
|
Services 27.8% 32.9% |
|
Government 13.7%
11.8% |
|
|
|
|
(000s) Mining 1.1 |
|
Construction
117.0 Manufacturing 162.5 |
|
TCPU 84.4 |
|
Trade
367.7 |
|
FIRE 120.0 |
|
Services 507.0 |
|
Government 181.2 |
|
TOTAL 1,540.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TYPICALLY ABOVE AVG PAYING JOBS |
|
Mining |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Wholesale Trade |
|
TCPU |
|
TYPICALLY BELOW AVG PAYING JOBS |
|
Retail Trade |
|
Services |
|
Government |
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County |
|
Industries with Above Average Employment |
|
Source: ASU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education and workforce |
|
Energy |
|
Telecommunications |
|
Transportation |
|
Water |
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
Tribal Land Tribal Land Total |
|
|
|
Percent population with: |
|
High School Degree |
|
Maricopa
County 82.6% 61.6% 82.5% |
|
Arizona
81.6% 57.5% 81.0% |
|
College Degree* |
|
Maricopa County
32.9% 7.8% 32.9% |
|
Arizona
30.8% 12.1% 30.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SRP, APS |
|
Sufficient Power |
|
|
|
|
Maricopa 2.1% |
|
Pima 2.7% |
|
Pinal 5.5% |
|
Mohave 3.8% |
|
Yavapai 2.9% |
|
Yuma 5.4% |
|
Cochise 4.6% |
|
Navajo 25.4% |
|
Coconino 11.6% |
|
Gila 6.2% |
|
Santa Cruz 6.3% |
|
Apache 46.1% |
|
Graham 6.7% |
|
La Paz 10.1% |
|
Greenlee 4.7% |
|
|
|
|
Freeway
system expanding. |
|
Excellent central airport access; need additional
commercial outlets. |
|
Commute
times expected to increase as area grows (22 min. in 1990, 25 min.
in 2000). |
|
Highway
85 international trade potential; future roadway improvements? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water supply appears adequate to meet
future demand. |
|
|
|
|
Maricopa |
|
County Arizona |
|
|
|
Individual or Corporate 31.0% 17.0% |
|
Forest Service 11.0%
16.0% |
|
BLM
42.0%
20.0%
State
11.0% 13.0% |
|
Indian Reservations
4.0% 27.0% |
|
Other Public 1.0% 7.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Opportunities by Region |
|
Source: Economy.com |
|
|
|
|
Economic Opportunities |
|
In Maricopa County |
|
Source: Economy.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona’s Economic Opportunities |
|
Average Wage by Industry |
|
Source: Economy.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry
Concentration |
|
Energy
Dependability |
|
Cost of
Workers |
|
Unemployment Insurance |
|
Worker
Compensation |
|
Built
Space Cost |
|
Telecommunications Services |
|
Venture
Capital Availability |
|
Regulatory Policies |
|
Business
Taxes |
|
|
|
|
Develop
a tax and fiscal policy conducive to stimulating the economy. |
|
Improve educational
attainment. |
|
Make
significant investments in R&D and innovation/support university
system. |
|
Improve
physical infrastructure |
|
Position
globally. |
|
Enhance
the quality of life. |
|
|
|
|
Can
rural communities benefit from the metro area’s economic opportunities? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Out of |
|
# Visitors In State
State |
|
|
|
Grand Canyon 4,500,000 35.6% 64.4% |
|
Metro Phoenix 12,300,000
22.0% 78.0% |
|
Central 800,000
41.3% 58.7% |
|
North East 400,000
43.8% 56.2% |
|
East Central 900,000 85.9%
14.1% |
|
South Central/East 4,300,000 32.6% 67.4% |
|
West Coast 1,900,000 14.3% 85.7% |
|
|
|
|
Number of Hotel Rooms in 2000 |
|
& Percent of Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farm Personal Income $221,641 |
|
Non-Farm Personal Income $87,454,545 |
|
|
|
Farm Income as a % of Total 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
